District sues landlord Sanford Capital over poor housing conditions. Again.

A memorial to a murder victim sits outside an apartment building on G Street in southeast D. C. that has a reputation as a drug den, on Dec. 2, 2016. The District is now suing the former owner of the complex, Sanford Capital, to recoup rent payments made by tenants who the city alleges lived in poor conditions. (Michael Robinson Chavez/The Washington Post)
 February 15 at 12:56 PM 
D.C. Attorney General Karl A. Racine (D) has filed a pair of new lawsuits alleging poor housing conditions at buildings formerly owned by Sanford Capital, a company with an extensive network of apartments for low-income people that has drawn scrutiny for squalid conditions.

The new litigation, citing the city’s consumer protection laws, seeks to recoup rent paid by tenants who lived at Sanford properties on Franklin Street NE and G Street SE. The lawsuits allege that property managers failed to respond to rodent and bedbug infestations, flooding and criminal squatters in vacant units, as well as broken heating systems in winter and sewage backups on G Street.

Racine’s office has previously sued Sanford Capital over what lawyers called deplorable conditions at two other properties in southeast D.C.

“Under District law, landlords have the duty to provide tenants with safe, secure and habitable housing,” Racine said in a statement. “Landlords who fail to adhere to these legal obligations cannot dodge liability by simply selling their properties.

An investigation by The Washington Post last year found a pattern of similar conditions at 19 complexes linked to Sanford Capital, which receives millions from the city annually through taxpayer-funded housing vouchers.

“These tenants made the difficult decision to continue residing at the property despite the hazardous and dangerous conditions caused by the defendants’ failure to maintain the property because these tenants lacked the means to move to another location,” the attorney general’s office says in both lawsuits.

Aubrey Carter Nowell, a principal of Sanford, did not respond to an email seeking comment on the latest allegations.

Housing inspectors reviewed both properties last year as part of a full sweep of Sanford buildings ordered by Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) following investigative reports in The Post and the Washington City Paper about poor housing conditions at Sanford. Bowser called the company out by name in her State of the District address last year.

During that sweep, inspectors found more than 1,000 violations of the housing code that carried the potential for more than $500,000 in fines. Sanford contested the violations in court. A spokeswoman for the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs said the agency has since levied nearly $268,000 and the company has paid $158,000 of that balance.

The lawsuits say Sanford Capital failed to abate 86 of 93 violations noted at the Franklin Street apartments and at least 57 of 94 serious violations at G Street.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s